Scientific datasets

Tasks you can run, answers you can check, feedback you can learn from. Bring these resources into your own model or RSI workflow.

Start with the molecular teaching package or its original benchmark. The collection is growing.

Where the data lives. Full datasets can stay in the original repository. This catalog links to the source and its access terms; small teaching downloads are provided separately.

Search and filter datasets

Browse by the resource’s main scientific field.

Capabilities describe what a task examines; they are separate from its scientific field.

Molecular discovery · Molecular property → structure

MolP2SBench

Original paper

Recover a masked molecular fragment using computed physical properties. Known structures provide reference answers; controlled views help investigate changes in predictions.

Teaching starter

2 observations · 2 candidates · 1 molecular family

Includes model inputs, separate labels, a scorer and a Python example. Python 3.9+; no API key needed for the smoke test.

Teaching adaptation: source and reuse notes.

Full benchmark

136 source problems per property channel · 2–4 candidates

Use the original repository for the complete task views, labels, prompts and scorer. Its format differs from the teaching starter.

External source. Check the repository and underlying data’s reuse terms.

  • Structure recovery
  • Evidence use
  • Counterfactual response

Capabilities examined in the full benchmark. The teaching pair introduces the interface.

What do these counts mean?

A task is one input record to answer. A family groups a source recovery problem with its related observations. A property channel supplies a kind of evidence, such as dipole magnitude. An evidence condition specifies how it is paired with the task: correct, shuffled or counterfactual. Keep related records together when building independent evaluation splits.

Input
Masked structure, property values and candidate completions
Output
A candidate choice for each observation
Feedback
Correctness and reference comparisons on development cases

Source and citation

Benchmark paper. Yuhang Xie, Zhiyi Shi, Zeyi Zhang, Zhisheng Qi, Yushun Dong, Yu Wang, Xiongye Xiao. MolP2SBench: Do LLMs Really Reason from Molecular Properties to Structure? arXiv:2610.12522 (2026).

Cite this resource

Cite the benchmark paper for MolP2SBench tasks and design. For QM9S-derived records, also cite the underlying QM9S paper and identify the dataset release used. Each source has its own reuse terms. A deep learning model for predicting selected organic molecular spectra · QM9S dataset release.

Select and copy the entries below, or download the BibTeX file above.

@misc{xie2026molp2sbench,
  title = {MolP2SBench: Do LLMs Really Reason from Molecular Properties to Structure?},
  author = {Yuhang Xie and Zhiyi Shi and Zeyi Zhang and Zhisheng Qi and Yushun Dong and Yu Wang and Xiongye Xiao},
  year = {2026},
  eprint = {2610.12522},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  primaryClass = {physics.chem-ph},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12522}
}

@article{zou2023molecularspectra,
  title = {A deep learning model for predicting selected organic molecular spectra},
  author = {Zihan Zou and Yujin Zhang and Lijun Liang and Mingzhi Wei and Jiancai Leng and Jun Jiang and Yi Luo and Wei Hu},
  journal = {Nature Computational Science},
  year = {2023},
  volume = {3},
  pages = {957--964},
  doi = {10.1038/s43588-023-00550-y},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00550-y}
}

Use the data in your improvement loop

  1. Run your model

    Give it the task inputs and collect predictions. Connect your model.

  2. Learn from feedback

    Score development cases and investigate errors. Follow a feedback example.

  3. Check fresh cases

    Compare versions on independent families with the same checker and budget. Start from the full source and build a family split; the teaching pair cannot supply fresh cases.

The teaching pair lets you try the interface. A research study needs additional independent families. Your system supplies the revisions; our proposed protocol examines changes to the improvement process.

Bring your data to the collection

Share original data or suggest an existing resource. Include its scientific use and sources; a paper is optional.

Contribute a dataset